Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2010, 09:40 AM   #1
LIforrelaxin
Senior Member
 
LIforrelaxin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 1,014
Thanked 880 Times in 514 Posts
Default Changes in the Wording of the Laws

So there have been a few threads with little bits of information in them about how some of the boating regulations are changing, especially in their wording. So I thought I would start this thread to give people a place to talk about some of the wording and content changes to the boating laws as we find them out.

For instance there is a thread about how the definition of now wake speed was rewritten which included some very good information from LT Dunlevy...

In another thread there was information the the limit at which you need to report a accident to the MP has gone from 500$ is now at 2000$ dollars

And I myself just found out the other day that the entire section pertaining to the 150' rule has been re-written:

VI. (a) To provide full visibility and control and to prevent their wake from being thrown into or causing excessive rocking to other boats, barges, water skiers, aquaplanes or other boats, rafts or floats, all vessels shall maintain headway speed when within 150 feet from:
(1) Rafts, floats, swimmers.
(2) Permitted swimming areas.
(3) Shore.
(4) Docks.
(5) Mooring fields.
(6) Other vessels.
(b) These requirements shall not apply when:
(1) Starting skiers from shore, docks or floats, as long as neither the boat nor the skier is endangering the life or safety of any person.

(2) A vessel is in the federal deepwater shipping channel of the Piscataqua River between navigation buoys R2, Wood Island at the mouth of the river and R12, opposite the Sprague Terminal.

Please note it is now apparently legal to start skiers from shore and docks.... This used to be illegal......
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island.....
LIforrelaxin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 12:18 PM   #2
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin View Post
Please note it is now apparently legal to start skiers from shore and docks.... This used to be illegal......
It's always been legal to start skiers from the dock or shore.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 02:48 PM   #3
LIforrelaxin
Senior Member
 
LIforrelaxin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 1,014
Thanked 880 Times in 514 Posts
Default

I disagree the wording I highlighted in my original post didn't exist until recently, exactly how recently I am not sure. There where provision to start skiers from swim rafts but never from docks or the shore. The 150' rule Always prevailed. Now weather that was always the intention or not I don't know. But previously the rule was written so that it was indeed illegal to start from a dock or a beach.... as you where not 150' from shore and there was no exception....

There is now however an exception written into the law.

I have found that many of the laws in this area are getting revised... and possible so that that there true intentions are understood rewritten more clearly...
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island.....
LIforrelaxin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 08:29 AM   #4
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 256
Thanked 514 Times in 182 Posts
Smile Time sure does fly!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSUKR View Post
It's always been legal to start skiers from the dock or shore.
You are correct SIKSUKR. I only researched back to the mid 90's, but the language in question existed as early as 1995.

Additionally the changes that Lt. Dunleavy referred to regarding "no wake" or "headway speed" definition took place back in 1995.

Finally, the accident reporting requirement upping the limit from $500 to $2000 took place back in 2004.
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010, 12:13 PM   #5
LIforrelaxin
Senior Member
 
LIforrelaxin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, not that one, the one on Winnipesaukee
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 1,014
Thanked 880 Times in 514 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip View Post
You are correct SIKSUKR. I only researched back to the mid 90's, but the language in question existed as early as 1995.

Additionally the changes that Lt. Dunleavy referred to regarding "no wake" or "headway speed" definition took place back in 1995.

Finally, the accident reporting requirement upping the limit from $500 to $2000 took place back in 2004.
Thanks for the research Skip... It doesn't surprise me that at some point and time there was some major revisions in the documents. To fix wording etc. And make sure that the intentions of the law where brought out. It sounds like that happened around 1995... Not as recently as I thought for sure...

The reason I was insistent upon the skier start issue was my family was burned on that one.... my father owned property on a Kingston lake and the first thing he got nailed for was starting a skier from the beach 150' rule violation... now of course that was back in the 60's times change and so do rules... now ever since then my family has just stuck with deep water starts.

Never the less looking at how laws change and get revised is an important thing.
__________________
Life is about how much time you can spend relaxing... I do it on an island that isn't really an island.....
LIforrelaxin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-09-2010, 01:45 PM   #6
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin View Post
The reason I was insistent upon the skier start issue was my family was burned on that one.... my father owned property on a Kingston lake and the first thing he got nailed for was starting a skier from the beach 150' rule violation... now of course that was back in the 60's times change and so do rules... now ever since then my family has just stuck with deep water starts.
.
We have been beach/dock starting skiing for almost 50 years.Never heard of not being able to.I might be mistaken but I thought the 150 ft rule has only been in place since the 90's.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.15734 seconds