Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-08-2006, 07:00 PM   #1
Alton Bay Resident
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 1 Post
Default West Alton Sandbar - Marine Patrol Trouble


Anyone at West Alton Sandbar today (Sat. 7-8-06)? Heard the Marine Patrol gave out many citations for boats being too close to shore and not 50' between boats.... One of my friends who was there got a ticket for $43. Marine Patrol indicated they were following through on a petition from West Alton Marina???

I have been at this sandbar many times and is one of the few where small children can enjoy the water... My 'bitch' is the Marine Patrol is not consistent in their enforcement...

Another problem is if you show up early and another boat comes and parks too close to you are you going to tell them to move further from you? NOT....

Any 'inside' comments on this??
Alton Bay Resident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 08:05 PM   #2
SBC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NH fresh waters and forests
Posts: 72
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Rafting

Is this the area to which your refer?

from Saf-C 407.03: ...Small's Cove in Alton, southwest of an imaginary line running southeast-northwest from light 75 on the northwestern end to the northernmost point of land marking the entrance to the first cove, south of Small's Cove on the south;

If so, then it is subject to rafting restrictions as follows:


PART Saf-C 407 RAFTING RULES

(a) In addition to and in conjunction with the requirements of RSA 270:44, no person, except as otherwise provided herein, shall, in a prohibited location or at a prohibited time:

(1) Form or allow a boat which he or she is operating or in charge of to be a member of a raft consisting of 3 or more boats;

(2) Form or allow the boat which he or she is operating or in charge of to be a member of a raft if any part of such raft is:

a. Less than 150 feet from shore; or

b. Less than 50 feet from any other raft; or

c. Less than 50 feet from any occupied single boat which is stationary upon the waters of the same lake or pond; and

(3) Anchor a single boat and cause it to remain stationary upon the waters of a lake or pond other than momentarily if any part of such boat is:

a. Less than 150 feet from shore; or

b. Less than 50 feet away from any raft; or

c. Less than 25 feet away from any other single boat which is stationary upon the waters of such lake or pond.


You may also want to refer to: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/...270/270-44.htm

Seems like the natives have complained and the MPs have responded. That's what we pay them to do. I am curious though; how can any law enforcement effort be consistant, water or land side, if they can't be in all places at all times?
SBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 08:36 PM   #3
Paugus Bay Resident
Senior Member
 
Paugus Bay Resident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gilmanton, NH
Posts: 754
Thanks: 136
Thanked 92 Times in 51 Posts
Default

We were there (anchored pretty far up). There were 5 MP boats (3 at the beginning of the channel) and 2 inside the sand bar. From what I was told, the 3 at the entrance were checking boats for boater certificates. The other 2 were moving everyone 150 feet from shore. A couple of people told me that they got $75 tickets. We were there from 10 - 7pm and they didn't bother us.

It really wasn't that crowded. They didn't seem too concerned with the 25 / 50 foot separation, only the 150 from shore.
Paugus Bay Resident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 08:37 PM   #4
Mashugana
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 73
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Is the anchor part of the boat?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBC
PART Saf-C 407 RAFTING RULES ...
(3) Anchor a single boat and cause it to remain stationary upon the waters of a lake or pond other than momentarily if any part of such boat is:

a. Less than 150 feet from shore; or

b. Less than 50 feet away from any raft; or

c. Less than 25 feet away from any other single boat which is stationary upon the waters of such lake or pond.
"...Any part of such boat..." does that include the anchor itself? The anchor is part of the boat isn't it?

And anchoring 150 foot from shore applies only in certain no raft zones, right?

It can be hard to follow all the rules if you can not understand them.

Thanks in advance.
Mashugana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2006, 11:45 PM   #5
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

I was anchored there during this as well. The MP gathered outside the sandbar for at least 20 minuted before they came in. I was well away from shore and at the start, the closest boat to me was about 40-50 feet, so I wasn't worried. Actually the place was pretty quiet, no loud music, no obvious drunks, just a bunch of kids swimming.

First they went to the extreme back of the area, down near where the channel leads to the marina. There were three or more good size crusiers close to each other and close to shore. I was too far to see the exact number and if they were actually touching. I also couldn't see if they were ticketed. One of these boats came out with a steaming captain. He yelled to a few boats along the way. Saying everyone was going to get tickets. One boat simply crossed the channel and anchored on the other side. (which is not a no rafting zone) The steaming captain stopped and talked with a MP boat in deep water. I'm not sure who initiated that conversation.

After that corner was cleared out. The MP started working their way along the swim lines. I guess they were enforcing the 150' from shore rule. Most of the boats moved up a few feet sometimes more. It sure looked like a few tickets were handed out but it wasn't obvious why some got them and some didn't.

They didn't seem interested in boats being too close together. Not far from me were two boats tied together and a third only a few feet away.

By now all the displaced boats were moving to new spots. So it was getting tight. Once a pontoon boat decide to anchor between my boat and my anchor, I decided it was time to leave.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-09-2006, 10:04 AM   #6
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

The rafting rules seem to change every few years. I remember a rule about distance from swim lines, but I can't find it online anymore, did it change?

NH has both laws and administrative rules. I'm not a lawyer so this may all be wrong. But I thought that the rules had to based in a law. I can't find where the 150' from shore rules (Saf-C 407.a.2.a and Saf-C 407.a.3.a) come from. There is no mention of distance from shore in any of the rafting laws or definitions of rafting (RSA 270:42, RSA 270:43, RSA 270:44, RSA 270:45, or RSA 270:46)

How can a rule be made to restrict rafting that prohibits an activity that clearly isn't rafting. Maybe some legal eagle will get a rafting ticket someday and fight this.

Last edited by jrc; 07-09-2006 at 10:42 AM.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 10:53 AM   #7
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Paugus Bay Resident wrote:
Quote:
There were 5 MP boats (3 at the beginning of the channel) and 2 inside the sand bar. From what I was told, the 3 at the entrance were checking boats for boater certificates.
Were they checking boats that were anchored or coming out of the cove? I thought the boating certificate law was a secondary law, meaning they have to "pull you over" for another violation and can't just "stop" boats to check for certificates.
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 11:07 AM   #8
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

In among the boats, I saw one of the big gray inflatables, and a small un-marked maroon aluminum boat. Floating outside the sandbar were three of their white fiberglass boats. They were pulling people over, I could not tell the reason. They didn't pull everyone over and they may have had a focus on PWCs, but my focus wasn't really on them.

Airwaves, they can always find a reason to pull you over.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 11:24 AM   #9
CEP
Senior Member
 
CEP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlton City,MA
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default My Opinion

If West Alton Marina has placed a petition maybe someone from West Alton Marina could come on and explain to the Forum Members, What's Up??
Also if I was a user of the sandbar in question, I would take my business to a place other than West Alton Marina!
I'm sure things would have been different if West Alton Marina would have let their feeling be know before contacting the MP's.
Makes for a better customer relationship!

CEP
CEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 11:35 AM   #10
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Sure they can always find a reason, but it has to be legit, otherwise sooner or later they'll pull over the wrong boat and the state will get caught up in serious litigation.

As I understand it, the intent of the law was to NOT give MP the authority to pull folks over to check for boating certificates, but if the boater is stopped for a violation of rules then MP should check for the certificate.

Seems to me it was a safeguard included by lawmakers to prevent random checks.

Now if they were checking boats at anchor that may have been violating a no rafting rule, that's fine. To pull over a boat that is underway and check for the certificate goes beyond the scope of the law as I understand it.

I'd be interested to see, of the boats pulled over that were underway, were any tickets handed out for violations other than lack of boating certificates?
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 03:23 PM   #11
Lakegeezer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 1,656
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 342
Thanked 614 Times in 277 Posts
Default Would be nice to know

This incident and others beg for a transparent MP organization. It would be nice to know what is being enforced and where. I assume the records are public. Why doesn't any newspaper print the log?
__________________
-lg
Lakegeezer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 09:52 PM   #12
APIMIS
Junior Member
 
APIMIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MASS
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I believe I am the steaming Captain as you say; although I was not steaming I was just answering a question from a friend that happened to be anchored at the sandbar. As for the going out to talk to the MP’s I was sent out there to receive my ticket for being anchored in a no rafting either under the 150 foot mark or being to close to other boats. I’m still not sure which? The MP that gave me my ticket was not clear as to which one I was being cited for. The MP that sent me out told me that everyone to the right of me was being ticketed. The MP Officers were not consistent with their info when asked questions or ticketing process. The one point that was consistent was that it was the property owners that were complaining. My concern is that with all the homes being built on the shore lines can they just arbitrarily designate no rafting zones as they call it whenever homeowners chose not to share public waters with the boating public which would further restrict anchoring and swimming areas for families. With the price of gas and not having a legal place to anchor where the children can swim safely it won’t be worth having a boat on the lake.
APIMIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 10:15 PM   #13
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

I'm sorry if I misinterpreted and mis-reported your demeanor as "steaming". I thought you were just angry about the ticket.

I agree with all your remarks about the arbitrary nature of no rafting zones.

I'm not sure who owns that beach, there doesn't seem to be a house associated with it. What other property is bothered by the boats rafting there?
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2006, 10:35 PM   #14
tbutler
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by APIMIS
My concern is that with all the homes being built on the shore lines can they just arbitrarily designate no rafting zones as they call it whenever homeowners chose not to share public waters with the boating public which would further restrict anchoring and swimming areas for families.
The area on the northwest side of the channel into Small Cove has been
designated no-rafting for many years. So the enforcement action may
have been instigated by a landowner's complaint, but the NR designation
has been there a long time.
tbutler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 12:11 AM   #15
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

APIMIS:
Quote:
As for the going out to talk to the MP’s I was sent out there to receive my ticket for being anchored in a no rafting either under the 150 foot mark or being to close to other boats. I’m still not sure which? The MP that gave me my ticket was not clear as to which one I was being cited for.
What?

The MP that gave you a ticket didn't know why?

If you were anchored in the area that we have been discussing then you were probably in a restricted area. Property owners may have called the MP to enforce the rules, but if they (MP) are going to start handing out tickets (fines) then they had best know what they are for!

If the area you were in was not designated a no rafting zone and the MP deployed 5 vessels at the whim of property owners, well then we have a serious issue!

Bottom line, the ticket needs to say what rule you violated. Does it?
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 06:49 AM   #16
billhurley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Augustine FL.
Posts: 86
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

JRC,
That land is owned by the owners of West Alton Marina. I know they have not complained. I am not sure what home owner did.

Last edited by billhurley; 07-18-2006 at 02:01 PM.
billhurley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 10:10 AM   #17
Lakewinniboater
Senior Member
 
Lakewinniboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Westford, MA and Alton Bay, NH
Posts: 225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default West Alton Marina

I too am a West Alton Marina client and have been for some years. Although, I do not see them calling and complaining..... you never know.

I do know that they make it clear to their clients that they may use the land behind the sand bar....they also make it clear that we are to tell people using the land that they MUST be part of West Alton Marina to use it.

I have seen MANY MANY people utilizing the land for their dogs to relieve themselves and their children to play in the sand. If it was my land, I wouldn't be all that happy either. The owners do try to be amicable and helpful but you never know.... maybe they got annoyed with the blantant disrespect for their requests.
__________________
Wendy
"Wasn't Me!"
Lakewinniboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 01:11 PM   #18
Rayhunt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gilford NH
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Rafting

Im embarrassed to say ive never been there .. I know its a NRZ and one of the reasons ive never stayed.. Are there houses along the shore in the NRZ ?? I realy think MP should have better things to do ?
Rayhunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 03:11 PM   #19
SixStars
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default More MP enforcement on Sunday

The MP was there again on Sunday. I noticed they had a list they were looking at and appeared to by checking registration numbers. I have no idea why they were doing this. Anyone else have any clue what they might have been doing? They made a number of boats move and appeared to hand out several tickets.
SixStars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 04:06 PM   #20
topwater
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 302
Thanks: 85
Thanked 116 Times in 48 Posts
Default

WOW, It appears that no matter what the Marine Patrol does is WRONG. They can't seem to please any of you. If they weren't able to do what they did, then there's a issue, but don't Pi## and Moan here, call someone and do something about it, don't wait for the other guy, step up to the plate!!! I don't believe I've EVER heard one good thing about MP on this forum, its always negative negitive negitive, sounds like bad attitudes being brought into the state. DEAL with it, if your not enjoying it, pull up anchor and go have a ice cream somewhere. I have no connection at all with the MP, so please don't GO OFF on that tangient
topwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 06:23 PM   #21
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Re: checking registration numbers

Just guessing, but I think if you got a "please move" and no ticket on Saturday and come Sunday you're are back in the same spot, you'll be sorry.

Just like that warning the State Police gave me on Thursday on RT 93. Next time I'll be paying.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 07:49 PM   #22
John A. Birdsall
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 599
Thanks: 27
Thanked 51 Times in 35 Posts
Default

I'm not sure who owns that beach, there doesn't seem to be a house associated with it. What other property is bothered by the boats rafting there?

When I was a young man, many years ago, I had friends their their parents owned that beach, and have since sold peice's of it off. Recall that the state owns up to high water mark. My friends came from Reading Mass.
John A. Birdsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 09:44 PM   #23
Lakewinniboater
Senior Member
 
Lakewinniboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Westford, MA and Alton Bay, NH
Posts: 225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default West Alton Marina

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Birdsall
I'm not sure who owns that beach, there doesn't seem to be a house associated with it. What other property is bothered by the boats rafting there?

When I was a young man, many years ago, I had friends their their parents owned that beach, and have since sold peice's of it off. Recall that the state owns up to high water mark. My friends came from Reading Mass.
The owners of the Marina own the beach and land on BOTH sides of the channel and much of the Mauhaut Shores area.
__________________
Wendy
"Wasn't Me!"
Lakewinniboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 09:53 PM   #24
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,544
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,393
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
Default Been NRZ for about 20 years.

This area has been a no rafting zone since before my Dad passed away, and that was in 1988. I'm guessing that it would have been more in the early to mid 80's. When on vacation, we would go down to the "Sand Bar" and would have anywhere from 2 to as many as 8 or 10 boats rafted together. Everyone had kids or grandkids, no stereos blaring, and a respect for each others boats and the neighboring boats and landowners. When the no rafting came in, the marine patrol would come by on a regurlar basis, and were quite firm but fair, and tell you if it appeared the boats were too close. They didn't particularly care who was there first, just wanted to see the proper space between boats. Most boaters would be accommadating, a few gave out the lip service, and got repaid with a ticket.

We keep our boat at West Alton, and aside from an early in the day swim, or very late in the evening, we prefer to go out to deeper water and swim. A little more difficult with the grandkids, but we make do. Don't have to put up with someone trying to run over your anchor rope that way.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 11:21 AM   #25
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

I don't think there is any question that there has been a no rafting zone there for many years and that the MP have the right and duty to enforce that.

My only question of the MP is priorities. Police are always balancing where to use their limited resources. Was this the best place to use five boats and ten officers on a busy weekend afternoon? There was almost zero chance of someone being injured due to rafting. Was that choice made because of a squeaky wheel land owner?

Most of my criticism and curiosity is about no rafting zones in general. What is there purpose, is there a safety rational or is just an annoyance factor? How is it decided where to put them? How do the extra rules get added? Can the zones be removed? Can the rules be changed? It's one thing to have a no rafting zone, it's another to use that law to invent a no anchoring zone.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 03:55 PM   #26
Paugus Bay Resident
Senior Member
 
Paugus Bay Resident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gilmanton, NH
Posts: 754
Thanks: 136
Thanked 92 Times in 51 Posts
Default

My concern is the inconsistent (seemingly arbitrary) enforcement of regulations. I've been going to Small's Cove for a long time. One week the MP will cruise through the sandbar (last year on a Jet Ski) and not do anything. The next week they bring in an armada. Sometimes I get the feeling that even they aren't sure what they're enforcing.

I think one of the MPs biggest issues is credibility. The inconsistencies don't just apply to Smalls Cove, but enforcement on the lake in general. It also doesn't seem that resources are being deployed in a way that maximizes safety on the lake. My HO, your's may vary.
Paugus Bay Resident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 06:23 PM   #27
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Default 150 ft from shore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashugana
"...Any part of such boat..." does that include the anchor itself? The anchor is part of the boat isn't it?

And anchoring 150 foot from shore applies only in certain no raft zones, right?

It can be hard to follow all the rules if you can not understand them.

Thanks in advance.

The rule for any and all boats to be 150' from shore applies in all places designated "No Rafting Zones" (perhaps better termed anchoring restricted zones). Do a search on the forum and you'll find a pretty thorough discussion on this topic. Even boats not "rafted" (is that 2 or 3 boats close together ) are covered by the "rafting" rules as shown in the earlier post.

As to why the MP was out in force this weekend ... I dunno. I'll guess it's because most of the time the NRZ rules are ignored and with boat population and shore development both going up it's inevitable there's going to be (more) friction. While shorefront owners can petition for a NRZ designation they don't get to call someplace an NRZ by themselves. Nor does it prohibit people from anchoring offshore, it just regulates how close in and how closely spaced people (boats) can be.
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 06:43 PM   #28
Silver Duck
Senior Member
 
Silver Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Billerica, MA
Posts: 364
Thanks: 40
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Just a thought...

but, is it posible that Director Barrett is responding to all the talk last Winter about the excessive drinking that sometimes goes on at the sand bars being a major safety problem?

Enforcing the "No Rafting" rule provides a tailor-made opportunity for the marine patrol to perform a close check of what's going on and establish a strong presence!

I really can't imagine any other reason that would justify a five boat raid on a sand bar, while taking their eye off Captain Bonehead and all his relatives elsewhere on the lake.

Silver Duck
Silver Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 08:36 AM   #29
Paugus Bay Resident
Senior Member
 
Paugus Bay Resident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gilmanton, NH
Posts: 754
Thanks: 136
Thanked 92 Times in 51 Posts
Default

The interesting thing is that last weekend, the vast majority of the boats there were families with lots of kids. I didn't seen any drinking (lots of Poland Spring bottles) and there was no loud music. Just a lot of families enjoying the day. It was a refreshing change.
Paugus Bay Resident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 08:40 AM   #30
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 246
Thanked 736 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc

Most of my criticism and curiosity is about no rafting zones in general. What is there purpose, is there a safety rational or is just an annoyance factor? How is it decided where to put them? How do the extra rules get added? Can the zones be removed? Can the rules be changed? It's one thing to have a no rafting zone, it's another to use that law to invent a no anchoring zone.

I would bet that the purpose is just to avoid a disturbance of the peace and I'm certain there is a history of loud and obnoxious raft-ups that led to the rules.

While the ends are acceptable, the means kinda stink, in my opinion. NRZs "punish" everyone indiscriminately. To me, the ability for the MP to tell me that I cannot allow two boats to safely and quietly tie up to my boat in certain areas is preposterous. I doubt the NRZ rules would stand up in court if one were to push it. Maybe I should ask my Senator to sponsor a bill. Perehaps we could tackle the absurd "no overnight anchoring" rule as well...

My thoughts: If you plan to hang out at a NRZ sandbar, get there early, anchor legally, and take digital photos of the space around you. That way, if the MP shows up and hassles you for being to close to other boats, you can show them you were there first. May not work, but it's better than just getting angry about someone just trying to enforce the law.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 09:34 AM   #31
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Wink R. O. A. R.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
{snip} I doubt the NRZ rules would stand up in court if one were to push it. Maybe I should ask my Senator to sponsor a bill. Perehaps we could tackle the absurd "no overnight anchoring" rule as well...

If you can regulate parking and public gatherings on land I can't see any legal reason you can't do the equivalent on the water. Like I've said on this topic before the existing NRZ rules try to balance the desires of the boating public and the shorefront owners. Neither comes out a clear winner IMO. I'd worry your Senator might follow prior thoughts re: making the entire lake a NRZ.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R
My thoughts: If you plan to hang out at a NRZ sandbar, get there early, anchor legally, and take digital photos of the space around you. That way, if the MP shows up and hassles you for being to close to other boats, you can show them you were there first. May not work, but it's better than just getting angry about someone just trying to enforce the law.
This is an interesting thought. If you're ticketed for being too closely spaced how does anyone know it was you that initiated the offending action ? It's one thing to be ticketed for anchoring too close to shore, that's entirely under your control, but if someone else encroaches on "your space" in an NRZ ?? I wonder what the court ruling would be if such a ticket were contested. Time to form that PAC (R.O.A.R.) I guess. Usually I think the MP just tells the boats to move rather than issue tickets in these cases.
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 11:13 AM   #32
Alton Bay Resident
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 1 Post
Default Establish Boat Parking

Here's a thought… on any popular sandbar, establish mooring balls for the season. Properly spaced for between boats and from shore. If you don't get to the sandbar early enough, you have to wait till a 'spot' opens up. It's along the same lines as getting a public dock on the lake, limited number of spaces.

This e would avoid someone coming late and encroaching in your space. It would also take all the guesswork our for boaters and let everyone relax.
Alton Bay Resident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 01:18 PM   #33
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default Who's first?

Great idea on the moorings.A friend was ticketed once in Braun for the exact same scenario after being there before others.I believe he wrote a letter and the ticket was dropped.I found a similar situation at the parking meters in front of my building.There were several motorcycles parked in one spot and in another a car was obviously parked in the spot first and then a motorcycle parked behind it.I asked the meterlady if she would ticket them and she said no because they could not prove who was there first.Sounds like the MP would have to have the same thought process and just have people move apart.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 01:43 PM   #34
Phantom
Senior Member
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 445
Thanked 604 Times in 340 Posts
Default Mooring Balls

If I'm not mistaken -- having mooring balls out is EXACTLY what they do at Lake George, NY. No Ball - No Anchoring!
Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 05:14 PM   #35
Jonas Pilot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wolfeboro, New Hampshire is my home, 24-7-365
Posts: 1,686
Thanks: 1,047
Thanked 336 Times in 189 Posts
Default

Good Idea on the mooring balls A Bay Res!
Jonas Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 09:17 PM   #36
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

The down side to mooring balls that I can see are:

Who puts them out, takes them in and maintains them? $$$

What happens when someone ties up to the mooring ball in front of your cottage that you have a permit for and use for your own boat?
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 09:40 PM   #37
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Although I love the idea of mooring balls, it will never happen. Airwaves is right, there is no financial reason for mooring balls at a sandbar. The towns build docks because it helps the local business.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 10:05 PM   #38
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,084
Thanks: 1,267
Thanked 557 Times in 286 Posts
Default

I have a question for those on the board who want more marine patrol officers to "control" the go fast boaters, mooring balls to solve the rafting issues and more money spent to keep the lake water clean, and so forth. How are we to pay for these services?
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 11:20 PM   #39
Skipper of the Sea Que
Deceased Member
 
Skipper of the Sea Que's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 1/2 way between Boston & Providence
Posts: 573
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 32
Thanked 55 Times in 22 Posts
Arrow Braun Bay NRZ Invasion from 2000

This thread reminds me of a similar enforcement effort at Braun Bay during the 2000 season.

For those interested, here's a link to the thread starter and some interesting reading from the OLD forum archives:

MP Invades Braun Bay

At the time I had many of the same questions I see posted in the current thread. What does happen when I'm at anchor and someone makes a raft closer than 50 feet to my boat? We are both in violation.

As for mooring balls: Orange balls are supposed to be in the NRZ in Braun Bay to mark the 75 foot distance from shore you can anchor - not to use as a mooring but to mark the distance. One year they had signs out at Braun Bay with the NRZ rules. I believe the signs were placed 75 feet from shore. The rules for the WAM area sandbar are a little different.

Somewhere around here I have a few pictures of a Marine Patrol boat on routine patrol passing close to NRZ violators in Wentworth Cove - not interested in NRZ enforcement.
__________________



Amateur HAM Radio What is it? You'll be surprised. When all else fails Ham Radio still works.
Shriners Hospitals providing specialized care for children regardless of ability to pay. Find out more or refer a patient.
Skipper of the Sea Que is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 07:36 AM   #40
Commodore
Member
 
Commodore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 45
Thanks: 8
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Question Good Question about anchor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashugana
"...Any part of such boat..." does that include the anchor itself? The anchor is part of the boat isn't it?

It can be hard to follow all the rules if you can not understand them.
I would think that the anchor is part of the boat but I hope not.

Does anyone know for sure?
__________________
The Commodore
Commodore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2006, 11:34 AM   #41
Airwaves
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I'm right here!
Posts: 1,153
Thanks: 9
Thanked 102 Times in 37 Posts
Default

secondcurve wrote:
Quote:
I have a question for those on the board who want more marine patrol officers to "control" the go fast boaters, mooring balls to solve the rafting issues and more money spent to keep the lake water clean, and so forth. How are we to pay for these services?
I posted a funding source several times during the HB 162 debate, simply eliminate the ability of boaters to get the state gasoline tax rebate. Then earmark those tax dollars collected by marinas, directly to Marine Patrol, this would be IN ADDITION, not in place of current funding sources.
Airwaves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 03:34 PM   #42
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Wink Parking meters ?

I also think public mooring balls in certain NRZs is an interesting idea. The question raised is cost and perhaps they could be combo mooring balls and parking (?mooring?) meters. I half jest but then again maybe there's an easy way to do this. If the balls can be made to pay for themselves (or nearly so) then the only question is whether people who use them would be willing to pay the price. So what's it cost to install and maintain a mooring field ? Instead of heavy duty mooring balls, could you have anchoring balls ? These wouldn't hold a boat in place but rather just indicate where a boat can anchor ... perhaps less $$ to install & maintain. With the success of such things at the Alton Sand Bar and Braun Bay then we could be well on the way to ring the Witches (and perhaps other places), converting navigation hazards in boating hot spots. Pepper could open a floating stand and then ... darn dropped my Prozac ... will get right back to you with more on this ...
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:05 PM   #43
Joanna16
Member
 
Joanna16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On a Lake in NH
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skipper of the Sea Que
This thread reminds me of a similar enforcement effort at Braun Bay during the 2000 season.

.

MP was in Braun Bay Saturday too - 'round 4:15 3 boats.
Are there real violations and water safety issues to be addressed?
Joanna16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:55 PM   #44
WINNOCTURN
Deceased Member
 
WINNOCTURN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moultonboro
Posts: 849
Thanks: 350
Thanked 351 Times in 193 Posts
Default Revenue Enhancement????

If this is all for Revenue Enhancement they are really missing the “boat”. All the need to do is permanently station these three boats at the new “NO WAKE ZONE” between Governors Island and Eagle Island. Yah, it has made a big difference so far this season, NOT!


WINNOCTURN
WINNOCTURN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 09:03 AM   #45
SIKSUKR
Senior Member
 
SIKSUKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,075
Thanks: 215
Thanked 903 Times in 509 Posts
Default Not such a crazy Idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mee-n-Mac
I also think public mooring balls in certain NRZs is an interesting idea. The question raised is cost and perhaps they could be combo mooring balls and parking (?mooring?) meters. I half jest but then again maybe there's an easy way to do this. If the balls can be made to pay for themselves (or nearly so) then the only question is whether people who use them would be willing to pay the price. So what's it cost to install and maintain a mooring field ? Instead of heavy duty mooring balls, could you have anchoring balls ? These wouldn't hold a boat in place but rather just indicate where a boat can anchor ... perhaps less $$ to install & maintain. With the success of such things at the Alton Sand Bar and Braun Bay then we could be well on the way to ring the Witches (and perhaps other places), converting navigation hazards in boating hot spots. Pepper could open a floating stand and then ... darn dropped my Prozac ... will get right back to you with more on this ...
That's not such a crazy idea M&M.When I sailed around Tortola in the BVI,A lot of the mooring balls were fee based.You would hook on to a ball and later on someone would come by to collect the $20 fee.I'm not sure anyone would pay this kind of fee on Winni for a few hours usage.Granted,these moorings were really used for overnite use.The next morning it was off to the next island and harbor to find a mooring ball and a fun night ashore.
__________________
SIKSUKR
SIKSUKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 11:51 AM   #46
Lakewinniboater
Senior Member
 
Lakewinniboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Westford, MA and Alton Bay, NH
Posts: 225
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Silliness

I have to admit.... this year, since we have bought our home and have a large beach.... I am not at any of the sandbars or coves very often.

HOWEVER, I really beieve that the use of resources on that type of issue is REDICULOUS!!

Go after the Captain Boneheads that almost run us over daily!

I was near the Varney's at about 7pm yesterday (A MONDAY NIGHT!), with no one around we were going fairly slow and captain bonehead in his overfilled bow rider came up quickly on my right. He LITERALLY almost ran up over us. HELLO, I had the right of way!!!

Put the MP (who i do have respect for.... but not spending so many resources in the sandbars) on point to find the idiots that break the 150 and right of way issues!!!!
__________________
Wendy
"Wasn't Me!"
Lakewinniboater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 03:32 PM   #47
Rayhunt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gilford NH
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Mp

Its getting rediculous .. A MP boat comes over to the area were we are anchored and fires up his loud hailer which feeds back and splits everyones ears , to tell us that the island were anchored off is a loon sancuary and not to go ashore.. Well first of all the opposite side of this island is a LS not where we were , nor are there any loons or nest in this area..And noone was going ashore... But hey thanks for making all our day that much less enjoyable.. You mean to tell me there was nothing going on in any of the busy places like the wiers etc he had to venture out to this remote area to stir the pot ???
Rayhunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2006, 08:48 PM   #48
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Lightbulb Mooring masters

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSUKR
That's not such a crazy idea M&M.When I sailed around Tortola in the BVI,A lot of the mooring balls were fee based.You would hook on to a ball and later on someone would come by to collect the $20 fee.I'm not sure anyone would pay this kind of fee on Winni for a few hours usage.Granted,these moorings were really used for overnite use.The next morning it was off to the next island and harbor to find a mooring ball and a fun night ashore.
And that's another way to go about it. Hire a college kid to be the "mooring master" and collect fees from all the boats that use the mooring balls. Give him/her a free mooring and float whilst on the job and you might get find some applicants Course this further drives up the cost of running the feild but maybe it's cheaper than meters (probably not but certainly more practical). In any case secondcurve, jrc and Airwaves make a good point in that unless there's a real problem that this solves or somehow makes $$ for the State, there won't be any interest. Certainly the boaters who presently use the sand bar or Braun Bay gain little and lose something. That's why I suggested other, presently unused, places become, as APS put it, DRZ's with mooring balls. Moving some people away from the home owners so both parties can, well, party to their own music (so to speak) while bringing in some $$ to the State (or at least allowing some Rep to drone about summer job creation) and increasing the boating things-to-do, places-to-go quotient of the lake (meet ya at DRZ2 for rock snorkeling) and then further add in that in that the MP won't have to play "Nanny" anymore .... the idea might have enough appeal to catch on. Well, maybe* Certainly there have got to be other places than just the Witches which could make viable mooring sites. Not every raft-up needs to be at a beach or be able to touch bottom with your toes.

So again what does it cost to "run" a mooring field and then what $$/hr would have to be charged to break even ? Would anyone pay this amount ?? Let's take a cut at it. I figure there's maybe 15 useable weekends in a season, add in a few holidays and you get 33 days where you'd charge for the mooring. Charge between the hours of 7am and 7pm and you've got 396 hrs/ball/season. Charge, I dunno, $2/hr and figure an 65% occupancy rate and you've got ~$500/ball/season. Amortize the initial cost of the mooring over ? 10 ? years and figure an average feild size of ? 20 ? balls (to spread the mooring master's pay across) and could it come close to working financially ? Would people pay more $/hr ?? Y'all tell me.


*pigs do fly, really, I've seen them. Just nowhere near as good as Warthogs or Falcons.
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 06:56 AM   #49
Alton Bay Resident
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 1 Post
Thumbs up Count Me In!

I'd glady pay for a day without being potentially hassled by the MP....
Alton Bay Resident is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 08:21 AM   #50
robmac
Senior Member
 
robmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nashua,Meredith
Posts: 951
Thanks: 213
Thanked 106 Times in 81 Posts
Default

My family and I were at West Alton Monday,marine patrol came through and were polite in asking for people to relocate and also where would be a safe place(within thw 150'). Several boats did not have to move I would guess because they would have to leave but were still about 100' from shore
robmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 09:27 AM   #51
LAH
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default My two cents

I also keep my boat in the West Alton Marina and the fact is they did not make any complaints. It is unfortunate that people make statements without knowing all the facts.
LAH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 11:04 AM   #52
Rayhunt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gilford NH
Posts: 112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Its Bad

What happened to the day when you could go for a swim and have lunch out on the lake .. I personaly think the NRZs' are rediculous ! What gives anyone the right to have such an area established other than it being a navigational hazard.. Oh theres a nice spot of sand , lets close it off !!!!
Rayhunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2006, 10:20 PM   #53
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

I only know what is reported in this forum and I know that not everything reported here is true.

Unless you are one of the owners of West Alton Marina (Barbara or Brian), then you cannot possibly state as fact what they did or did not tell the Marine Patrol. If I was an owner of WAM, and I was requesting the MP to more vigorously enforce the NRZ, I would not admit it to my customers. What if a customer got a ticket, that's not good for business.

Once again, I have no way of knowing if the reports of what the Marine Patrol said are true.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 07:55 AM   #54
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,780
Thanks: 2,078
Thanked 735 Times in 530 Posts
Lightbulb Designated Rafting Zone...DNZ

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alton Bay Resident
I'd glady pay for a day without being potentially hassled by the MP....
The MPs are an extraordinary "presence" so far this season. Where I might have seen one every day, this season there have been as many as three in sight at once off my dock!

DRZs could be placed near present popular sites, but the mooring balls themselves would not have to be so large (such as those at popular snorkeling sites in Florida). They could be "seasonally maintained" by being sunk with a concrete block.

There would have to be some rules—signed by the rafter:

1) No overnights (7AM-7PM use only—ten bucks)
2) Cash only
3) No bow-to-stern raft-ups
4) No anchoring between bouys
5) Two-maximum boats at each bouy
6) Pay "the college kid" (with MP hat), who must present receipt (printed on rice paper) to the rafter, who must then post it visibly
7) Moorings must be abandoned upon approach of severe weather. (Note: Leaving a DRZ mooring otherwise frees it up for a new user)
8) No littering
9) No water balloon fights—no "other stuff" , like other places far from Winnipesaukee

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mee'N'Mac
Not every raft-up needs to be at a beach or be able to touch bottom with your toes.
Heavily-populated shallows and beach rafting areas are likely sites for Duck Itch and other "introduced troubles". Deep rafting areas—free of Duck Itch, severe wakes and wave action—could prove more popular!

Since the Granite State has no shortage of boulders and rocks, they could be trucked in on firm ice, piled, and arranged to protect against the worst wakes/waves. Making use of an existing troublesome area makes sense. (Bizer's Rock comes to mind).
__________________
Every MP who enters Winter Harbor will pass by my porch of 67 years...
ApS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 08:35 AM   #55
Joanna16
Member
 
Joanna16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On a Lake in NH
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The best thing about Alton, Braun and similiar is it's a great place to see our boating friends and family - now I think we'll just pick a spot in the middle of the lake and become a speed bump for Mr. Outta-Control and his drunken friends.
I love diving off the swim platform anyway.
Joanna16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 08:43 PM   #56
upthesaukee
Senior Member
 
upthesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alton Bay
Posts: 5,544
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 2,393
Thanked 1,918 Times in 1,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc
I only know what is reported in this forum and I know that not everything reported here is true.

Unless you are one of the owners of West Alton Marina (Barbara or Brian), then you cannot possibly state as fact what they did or did not tell the Marine Patrol. If I was an owner of WAM, and I was requesting the MP to more vigorously enforce the NRZ, I would not admit it to my customers. What if a customer got a ticket, that's not good for business.

Once again, I have no way of knowing if the reports of what the Marine Patrol said are true.
I too keep my boat at West Alton Marina, and I personally feel that if one of the owners tells me that they had nothing to do with the Marine Patrol stepping up enforcement at the sand bar, then that is a fact. That family and I started our business relationship with a handshake, actually a verbal ok over the phone, and have found them to be totally above board in all my dealings with them. Personal conversation with them this morning reiterated the fact that they did not call the MP, and I personally believe them. I only wish that all my business dealings could be done the way they have been with WAM. Mutual trust and respect is a wonderful thing, and unfortunately is missing in many business relationships today.

Just my humble opinion, of course.
__________________
I Live Here... I am always UPTHESAUKEE !!!!
upthesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2006, 06:36 AM   #57
fpartri497
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 681
Thanks: 97
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
Default west alton sandbar

yesterday, I guess the MP`s didnt feel like bothering anyone at the sandbar. Twice the same MP boat came over looked around for a min. and left. and there where plenty of boats anchored right off the beach. seems like only on the weekend do they bother people.

__________________
dont worry be happy
fpartri497 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 06:59 PM   #58
Aquadeziac
Senior Member
 
Aquadeziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 239
Thanks: 19
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Exclamation Captain Bonehead's cousin

These people are the ones saying "I am not illerate, my parents were married."---> This morning a friend and I took a short break in our jetski ride to cool off in the water at the sandbar outside WAM. Our skis were anchored well over 150' from shore and there were several other boats out on the fringes of the sandbar but nothing within at least a hundred feet of us. Suddenly a boat pulls in and the guy is putzing with his anchors, and proceeds to set his anchors so he is within 5' of one of our skis. Then all of a sudden his boat is bobbing against the ski. 72 square miles of water and he has to anchor so close he is hitting us!!! We had to end up moving the ski. Then two more boats and a jetski (all friends of Einstein here) show up and start anchoring in close and then they start disembarking and proceeded to drag three huge floating coolers, a portable barbeque and folding lawn chairs off the boat and to the beach. Now we are counting at least eight signs stating "Private Property" , "No Tresspassing" and the like. They proceeded to cart their stuff to the landowner's picnic table and even leaned folding chairs against a "No Tresspassing" sign. Its people like this that give considerate boaters a bad name. They obviously don't possess the inteligence to read and comprehend, or respect other people's property. Maybe the guys just have a set of shiney brass ones so big they have a hard time pulling their pants on......and yet, none of them walked funny. I guess everything was supposed to be okie dokie after we moved our jetski and they fully unpacked that they offered us a cold drink!!I think not! Smarten up people! Think of someone else and their stuff. If they were all from WAM, is everyone in there as inconsiderate as them?? And yet they would be the first to whine when Marine Patrol answers the property owner's complaint "Us?? We weren't doin nuthin', wanna brew officer?" I guess its true...You can't fix stupid.
__________________
"He who dies with the most toys wins"
Aquadeziac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 08:21 PM   #59
billhurley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Augustine FL.
Posts: 86
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Aquadeziac what does this inconsiderate person have to do with WAM? Do you know they are from there or just generalizing? Some how I think it may be the later.

I think you need facts before you lump all boaters of West Alton Marina into a stereotype.
billhurley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2006, 09:58 PM   #60
Mee-n-Mac
Senior Member
 
Mee-n-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
Thanks: 23
Thanked 111 Times in 51 Posts
Lightbulb If they were all from WAM ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by billhurley
Aquadeziac what does this inconsiderate person have to do with WAM? Do you know they are from there or just generalizing? Some how I think it may be the later.

I think you need facts before you lump all boaters of West Alton Marina into a stereotype.
... was the quote I read. I don't think Aquadeziac was saying that they were from WAM. I got the idea that he was thinking that because they were so blatant about ignoring the no trespassing signs that they might be.
__________________
Mee'n'Mac
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple stupidity or ignorance. The latter are a lot more common than the former." - RAH
Mee-n-Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 05:42 AM   #61
billhurley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Augustine FL.
Posts: 86
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Mee-n-Mac,
I read the same thing, but I think you should have facts before you make a comment like that.

I am a big supporter of WAM as you can tell.
billhurley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 10:06 AM   #62
chipj29
Senior Member
 
chipj29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
Default Landowner?

Aqua, perhaps the people with the big shiny brass ones were the landowner, or friends/relatives of the landowner?
I have no clue, just taking a guess...
chipj29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 03:13 PM   #63
LAH
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Nice

Aquadeziac, Your generalization of all boaters in WAM is inaccurate and mean spirited. If you had a problem with that particular group then that is where you should have directed your comments.
LAH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 08:07 PM   #64
Aquadeziac
Senior Member
 
Aquadeziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Concord NH
Posts: 239
Thanks: 19
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Exclamation Just the facts

First of all, Mee-n-Mac seems to be the only one reading punctuation. I asked if these people are from WAM, is everyone in there as inconsiderate as them.??? <----see the question marks?? Secondly, I had the opportunity later in the day to talk with a MP officer and was asking about the situations there of late in general. I was explained the "No Rafting" law in its entirety. And then further explained to that anyone upon the beach needs written permission from the property owner to be there and compared to a list to be supplied by the property owner to Marine Patrol for distribution to their patrol boats. At that time when we were talking, he had been given no names yet.
And thirdly, the first two boats did come out from WAM and we had been there long enough to see that they had not entered earlier (ie to get gas). We did not see where the third boat and the jetski came from as we busy moving our own jetski so it didn't get hit again, but given the short time frame, I don't think they came from the direction of open water.Finally, my own opinions of this crowd are rooted in the several times I have stopped there in the past several years, these WAMites self-proclaimed (even here on the forum) their entitlement to this area, only to make outsiders feel that they are letting us use their precious sandbar. I know of others who leave feeling the same way. I have found other places to anchor where the possessive attitude is non-existant. In my own way I look at the untimely enforcement of the Law more as Poetic Justice.
__________________
"He who dies with the most toys wins"
Aquadeziac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2006, 09:10 PM   #65
jrc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 33
Thanked 439 Times in 249 Posts
Default

Doesn't seem like much fun for a WAMite (WAMy?) to untie their boat and drive to that sandbar to anchor. It hardly seems worth the effort. We see a few boats anchored in the shallow water in front of Silver Sands. I wonder if WAMies boat over to anchor in front of Silver Sands and the Sandies boat over to anchor in front of WAM.

Aquadeziac: I guess WAM customers are allowed to use the beach behind the sandbar, so all the No tresspassing sign stuff really wasn't an issue.

As to anchoring so close to your vessel, mistakes happen. First I'd give the benefit of the doubt, tell him he's too close and ask him to move. The next step depends on his attitude. If he's a newbie, offer to help. If he's a jerk and his boat bobbed against your boat, I would be steamed. You should have wrote down his hull number and asked for his insurance papers. Tell him you're going to file an accident report. That would have got his attention.
jrc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.35506 seconds