Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > Boating
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2016, 08:09 AM   #1
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,959 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default Tubing in Channels/Passageways

I've noticed a ton of people taking tubes through channels and otherwise thin passageways this summer--saw two people going through the thin no-wake near Whaleback just yesterday. Isn't this both a legal and courtesy faux-pas? A week ago, one tube being pulled swung almost directly in front of us and needed to be pulled in by someone on the boat.

Thoughts?

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 08:13 AM   #2
FWP
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 21
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
I've noticed a ton of people taking tubes through channels and otherwise thin passageways this summer--saw two people going through the thin no-wake near Whaleback just yesterday. Isn't this both a legal and courtesy faux-pas? A week ago, one tube being pulled swung almost directly in front of us and needed to be pulled in by someone on the boat.

Thoughts?

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
tottaly Illegal, I see It often at the west Alton Channel

FWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 08:23 AM   #3
ursa minor
Senior Member
 
ursa minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tuftonborough & Franklin MA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 99
Thanked 143 Times in 64 Posts
Default

It may not be illegal but it sure displays a lack of imagination for the possible consequences. I wouldn't want to put anyone, especially young children at risk of getting hit if they should fall off the tube and not be seen. Unfortunately, I don't think a lot of people think things through. We saw a boat anchored in the middle of the channel near the Barber's Pole this past Sunday afternoon with at least 4 people swimming nearby. Wouldn't have been my first choice of anchoring spots...
__________________
" Any day with a boat ride in it is a good day"
ursa minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 08:35 AM   #4
salty dog
Senior Member
 
salty dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Beverly Cove, Ma
Posts: 356
Thanks: 287
Thanked 147 Times in 81 Posts
Default

I've noticed it also. We were following a boat towing a tube in the narrow part of Alton channel just after Sandy Point and a rider fell off. Pretty dangerous in traffic, plus then, I slowed down forcing others behind me to also. Honestly, I wonder sometimes how much thinking goes on here. Another thing I've noticed often is boaters pulling tubers, heading towards us, will suddenly deviate from their course and swing around forcing me to change my course or even come off plane because sometimes you can't always tell the line the tube will take. Super observant is the word of the day.
__________________
I'd rather be relax'n at Winnipesaukee
salty dog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to salty dog For This Useful Post:
TriDad (08-27-2016)
Old 08-26-2016, 08:40 AM   #5
thinkxingu
Senior Member
 
thinkxingu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,939
Thanks: 1,152
Thanked 1,959 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FWP View Post
tottaly Illegal, I see It often at the west Alton Channel

The 150' rule, yes?

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
thinkxingu is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-26-2016, 08:42 AM   #6
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 246
Thanked 736 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ursa minor View Post
We saw a boat anchored in the middle of the channel near the Barber's Pole this past Sunday afternoon with at least 4 people swimming nearby. Wouldn't have been my first choice of anchoring spots...
I suspect what you saw was done on purpose specifically to slow boats down, I cannot imagine anyone was dumb enough to anchor there without ulterior motives.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post:
Sue Doe-Nym (08-27-2016), VitaBene (08-26-2016)
Old 08-26-2016, 08:50 AM   #7
ursa minor
Senior Member
 
ursa minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tuftonborough & Franklin MA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 99
Thanked 143 Times in 64 Posts
Default

You would think, but it wasn't a boat from anywhere local that I recognized. They seemed completely oblivious to where they were and the surrounding boat traffic. I'm afraid someone may have been testing Darwin's theory's.
__________________
" Any day with a boat ride in it is a good day"
ursa minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 08:58 AM   #8
Doobs41378
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 510
Thanks: 234
Thanked 88 Times in 73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
The 150' rule, yes?

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
Isn't the 150' rule while on plane? I mean you are within 10 ft of boats in the channel. None the less I agree that it is not very bright to be doing this.
Doobs41378 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 09:00 AM   #9
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 61
Thanked 700 Times in 455 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
The 150' rule, yes?

Sent from my XT1528 using Tapatalk
No wake within 150' of xyz doesn't mean no passage within 150' of xyz.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 09:03 AM   #10
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 61
Thanked 700 Times in 455 Posts
Default

It could get interesting if the person being towed has an issue and a boat following is faced with the choice of hitting rocks or the person.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 09:04 AM   #11
Phantom
Senior Member
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Berlin, Ma / Gilford
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 445
Thanked 604 Times in 340 Posts
Default

Unless there is some quirk in the NH RSA's that I do not know about ---when you say pulling a tube in a Channel I am also presuming the boat is at no wake speed .. thus - although not bright by any stretch of the imagination -- is legal. It is no different (technically) than having a boat in tow.

Thus the 150' rule does not apply (at headway speed)



.
__________________
A bad day on the Big Lake (although I've never had one) - Still beats a day at the office!!
Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 09:11 AM   #12
ursa minor
Senior Member
 
ursa minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tuftonborough & Franklin MA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 99
Thanked 143 Times in 64 Posts
Default

I see people pulling kids on tubes at speed all the time going through narrow areas such as the Barber's Pole channel and the passage between Little Bear and Long Island near Point Sarah. They're often in the center or to the left side of the channel as well, little to no imagination or consideration of what's going on around them in my (biased) opinion. (Love it when they turn into your course and you see everyone in the boat, driver included looking backwards at the tubers.) I've seen kids still on tubes behind boats attempting to dock in Wolfeboro. What could happen, right?
__________________
" Any day with a boat ride in it is a good day"
ursa minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 10:57 AM   #13
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,855
Thanks: 459
Thanked 659 Times in 365 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8gv View Post
It could get interesting if the person being towed has an issue and a boat following is faced with the choice of hitting rocks or the person.

That's a no brainer, hit the rocks.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 10:58 AM   #14
rick35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bear Island/Merrimack
Posts: 707
Thanks: 54
Thanked 170 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ursa minor View Post
...Unfortunately, I don't think a lot of people think things through...
Isn't that the truth! Its amazing how many people are oblivious to what they're doing and I don't just mean boating. I tried to teach my kids to think of the next action when they were young. They get it as adults so I will say my efforts paid off.
rick35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 12:57 PM   #15
8gv
Senior Member
 
8gv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,002
Thanks: 61
Thanked 700 Times in 455 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD View Post
That's a no brainer, hit the rocks.
Yup, it's the right thing to do.

Now the boat is damaged due to the situation created by the towing.

What happens next is what will be interesting.
8gv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 01:13 PM   #16
DBreskin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wolfeboro NH
Posts: 283
Thanks: 143
Thanked 121 Times in 76 Posts
Default Channel definition?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ursa minor View Post
We saw a boat anchored in the middle of the channel near the Barber's Pole this past Sunday afternoon with at least 4 people swimming nearby.
Wikipedia defines a channel as "the dredged and marked lane of safe travel which a cognizant governmental entity guarantees to have a minimum depth across its specified minimum width to all vessels transiting a body of water".

I recognize this is a Wikipedia definition and may not be accurate, but I don't think the Barber's Pole passage qualifies as a channel since it is neither dredged nor does it have a marked lane. The Graveyard might be considered a channel since it is marked, but I don't think it is dredged.

Regardless, I think it's foolish to anchor in a place that obstructs traffic.
DBreskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 01:31 PM   #17
ursa minor
Senior Member
 
ursa minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Tuftonborough & Franklin MA
Posts: 265
Thanks: 99
Thanked 143 Times in 64 Posts
Default

Agreed, "narrow area" is probably a better choice of words for this area. I grew up right there and we always referred to it as "the channel" in localese. Graveyard, Six Pack and obviously the Weirs channel are better examples.

As to the anchored boat, my thought was that it was like parking in one of the lanes on a busy road to have a family picnic.
__________________
" Any day with a boat ride in it is a good day"
ursa minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 01:43 PM   #18
noreast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 648
Thanks: 316
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD View Post
That's a no brainer, hit the rocks.
It is a no brainer, but, You could have a boat full of kids as well, Makes the act a hell of a lot harder.
noreast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 02:55 PM   #19
webmaster
Moderator
 
webmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,427
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 437
Thanked 3,697 Times in 820 Posts
Default

I remember that in my driver's ed class way back in 1969 the instructor asked this question:

"If you were in a situation where you had a choice of hitting a person, a dog or a tree which one would you choose?"

Many said the tree. His correct answer was the dog.
webmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 04:44 PM   #20
Newbiesaukee
Senior Member
 
Newbiesaukee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Coral Gables, winter; Long Island, summer
Posts: 1,349
Thanks: 921
Thanked 569 Times in 295 Posts
Default

The correct answer is not always the right answer.

In this hypothetical situation if I were the only passenger/driver I would like to think I would hit the tree. Interesting philosophical question.

My computer betrayed me yesterday and did not put tree as I had intended. Sorry.
__________________


"You're only young once, but you can be immature forever."

Last edited by Newbiesaukee; 08-27-2016 at 04:01 PM. Reason: Incorrect post.
Newbiesaukee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2016, 05:02 PM   #21
noreast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 648
Thanks: 316
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
Default

If I had enough time to chose from the 3, I'd stop.
noreast is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to noreast For This Useful Post:
Hillcountry (08-26-2016), ITD (08-27-2016)
Old 08-26-2016, 06:42 PM   #22
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,882
Thanks: 637
Thanked 2,147 Times in 894 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by webmaster View Post
I remember that in my driver's ed class way back in 1969 the instructor asked this question:

"If you were in a situation where you had a choice of hitting a person, a dog or a tree which one would you choose?"

Many said the tree. His correct answer was the dog.
If you get a choice between a tree and a telephone pole, take the pole. They are old, dead, and they will break off. The tree? Not so much!
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2016, 08:42 AM   #23
SAMIAM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 2,834
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,625 Times in 561 Posts
Default

Just curious....wondering how a channel is defined as opposed to a narrow bay that happens to be a no wake zone.
SAMIAM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2016, 09:06 AM   #24
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,855
Thanks: 459
Thanked 659 Times in 365 Posts
Default

I think there are areas that are obvious to long time boaters as busy constricted areas, not real a good idea to stop and swim or load tubers, that might not be obvious to someone up for a week and not familiar with the lake.

If you stop in an area for whatever reason and a parade of boats is passing closely on both sides of you or worse, just one side, it's probably a good idea to find a better spot.
ITD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2016, 11:37 AM   #25
Barney Bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 962
Thanks: 495
Thanked 273 Times in 174 Posts
Default Inconsiderate Pilots

While not a narrow passage, we were enjoying a sunset cruise headed south between Bear Island and the mainland last evening. Our enjoyment was briefly interrupted twice by boats overtaking us at plane and not more than 100 feet away. Fortunately, our guests enjoy rock and roll.
Barney Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2016, 12:46 PM   #26
Hillcountry
Senior Member
 
Hillcountry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In the hills
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 1,580
Thanked 761 Times in 456 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Bear View Post
While not a narrow passage, we were enjoying a sunset cruise headed south between Bear Island and the mainland last evening. Our enjoyment was briefly interrupted twice by boats overtaking us at plane and not more than 100 feet away. Fortunately, our guests enjoy rock and roll.
This happens too often to be counted on any given day we are on the lake.
Giant wakes, passing less than 150' on plane, flying through NWZ's, tubers being pulled in choke points...you name it.
I don't get why these simple, common sense rules can't be observed??
Also, more often than not, the pilot is staring you down, seemingly, daring you to say/do something.

Last edited by Hillcountry; 08-28-2016 at 02:21 PM.
Hillcountry is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hillcountry For This Useful Post:
HellRaZoR004 (08-28-2016)
Old 08-28-2016, 06:48 PM   #27
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 246
Thanked 736 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Bear View Post
While not a narrow passage, we were enjoying a sunset cruise headed south between Bear Island and the mainland last evening. Our enjoyment was briefly interrupted twice by boats overtaking us at plane and not more than 100 feet away. Fortunately, our guests enjoy rock and roll.
Not condoning what happened, but let's say they were 152' feet away and therefore legal, would the wake really be that much smaller? The described situation is where the 150 foot law makes little difference to the experience.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post:
ishoot308 (08-28-2016)
Old 08-28-2016, 08:40 PM   #28
DBreskin
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wolfeboro NH
Posts: 283
Thanks: 143
Thanked 121 Times in 76 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMIAM View Post
Just curious....wondering how a channel is defined as opposed to a narrow bay that happens to be a no wake zone.
See post #16 above.
DBreskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2016, 06:05 AM   #29
Barney Bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 962
Thanks: 495
Thanked 273 Times in 174 Posts
Default Common Courtesy

The message suggested in my above post [#25] did not mention a legal passing distance. The boat pilots could have altered their course to pass at a greater distance, or altered their speed to reduce the effect of their wake on the boat being passed.
Barney Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Barney Bear For This Useful Post:
noreast (08-29-2016)
Old 08-29-2016, 09:07 AM   #30
Kamper
Senior Member
 
Kamper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Thornton's Ferry
Posts: 1,295
Thanks: 67
Thanked 165 Times in 125 Posts
Default

The only thing you're supposed to do in a channel is transit. Human nature being what it is, expect anything.
Kamper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2016, 10:12 AM   #31
Dave R
Senior Member
 
Dave R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 246
Thanked 736 Times in 438 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Bear View Post
The message suggested in my above post [#25] did not mention a legal passing distance. The boat pilots could have altered their course to pass at a greater distance, or altered their speed to reduce the effect of their wake on the boat being passed.
I agree, but my point was that the wake difference between 80 feet away and 150 feet away is negligible. I don't think the 150' law was meant to reduce wakes, it's more of a safety measure to prevent collisions.

FWIW, if I was in control of the overtaking boat, I would have done so at 300+ feet (if possible) and if passing outside of 300 feet was not possible, I would have sped up (if possible) to reduce my wake size and passed outside of 150 feet. I use 300 feet because that's the scale I prefer on my chart plotter and I am quite experienced at judging it. The scale on my plotter is right next to my boat icon, so I routinely see what 300 feet from shore or other "landmarks" looks like.
Dave R is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave R For This Useful Post:
Barney Bear (08-29-2016)
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.26941 seconds