Go Back   Winnipesaukee Forum > Winnipesaukee Forums > General Discussion
Home Forums Gallery Webcams Blogs YouTube Channel Classifieds Calendar Register FAQDonate Members List Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2014, 04:14 PM   #1
Mirror Lake's BB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Wayne, PA & Mirror Lake
Posts: 150
Thanks: 116
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default Tuftonboro preliminary assessment

We just received our assessment in the mail and the new total value (land + building) decreased by %15. Does anyone know what is behind it? We are lakeside.

Thanks
Mirror Lake's BB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 04:17 PM   #2
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,410
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,381 Times in 957 Posts
Default

I don't but we had one on the lake increase and two decrease. It doesn't matter if most of the valuations went down, the rate will go up.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
Mirror Lake's BB (08-19-2014)
Old 08-19-2014, 09:41 PM   #3
secondcurve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,084
Thanks: 1,267
Thanked 557 Times in 286 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirror Lake's BB View Post
We just received our assessment in the mail and the new total value (land + building) decreased by %15. Does anyone know what is behind it? We are lakeside.

Thanks
Property values have taken a pounding in Tuftonboro over the last five years but as noted if all properties fell on average by 15% then the tax rate will need to rise by a like amount to keep tax revenue stable.
secondcurve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 11:49 PM   #4
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

My evaluation likewise went down in Moultonboro. I think we all know the reason, I hope we remember it in 2016..
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 06:17 AM   #5
Little Bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 561
Thanks: 105
Thanked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default

Mine went up about 5%. Abatement will be filed.
Little Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-20-2014, 06:22 AM   #6
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,410
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,381 Times in 957 Posts
Default

I know. I can't figure out why one of ours went up?? We didn't improve anything. And the market has certainly not improved that much.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 10:07 AM   #7
Little Bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 561
Thanks: 105
Thanked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default

I think these guys put on a blindfold and throw darts at a board. My two properties went up a combined $61,600.00. I called the Town and asked where I can find the assessments on line, but they are not posted. They said that they will try to post them in the next few days.
Little Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 10:23 AM   #8
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,512
Thanks: 3,118
Thanked 1,090 Times in 784 Posts
Default My understanding

Back in the days, evalauation was based on full time or seasonal residency, where the full time took the hit because they use the services such as schools etc. The state education mess change all that and it is the seasonal folks that are paying for the services whether they like it or not.

Now seasonal properties took a big hit in evaluation and the tax burden is shifted to the full time residents. Where it should be.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BroadHopper For This Useful Post:
Little Bear (08-20-2014)
Old 08-20-2014, 06:59 PM   #9
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default What ??

There is no distinction or flag (in Moultonboro) that taxes one group of owners more (or less) than another. Where did you get this understanding from ??


Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
Back in the days, evalauation was based on full time or seasonal residency, where the full time took the hit because they use the services such as schools etc. The state education mess change all that and it is the seasonal folks that are paying for the services whether they like it or not.

Now seasonal properties took a big hit in evaluation and the tax burden is shifted to the full time residents. Where it should be.
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 07:27 PM   #10
TiltonBB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gilford, NH and Florida
Posts: 2,897
Thanks: 644
Thanked 2,153 Times in 900 Posts
Default I agree

Quote:
Originally Posted by wifi View Post
There is no distinction or flag (in Moultonboro) that taxes one group of owners more (or less) than another. Where did you get this understanding from ??
There is no distinction about how the property is occupied. There is no "view tax". There is no tax based on the amount of lake frontage that you have. I have heard these statements from the uninformed for many years.

Your taxes are based on the value of your property. Yes, they add to the value for out buildings, docks, frontage etc., but so would any potential purchaser.

Your taxable valuation is based on the actual market value of the property if it were to be sold. There are no other specific taxes added because of anything else.
TiltonBB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2014, 09:08 PM   #11
Andrea.wiltfong
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 48
Thanks: 27
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default we just got ours back too...

We just purchased our house in June. Our assessment decressed 20K. Still well over what we paid for it.
Andrea.wiltfong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 09:03 AM   #12
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,512
Thanks: 3,118
Thanked 1,090 Times in 784 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wifi View Post
There is no distinction or flag (in Moultonboro) that taxes one group of owners more (or less) than another. Where did you get this understanding from ??
Looks like you were not around back in the 80's when the state took over property evaluation to help equalize education payments among towns. This concept is still a mess today and the legislature is still scrambling after the NH Supreme Court shut down the current distribution structure.

Before this whole mess, the towns would appraise properties according to present use, residential, agricultural, commercial, unimproved etc. It made sense to tax the year round residence because they use the schools etc. And the seasonal will get a break.

When the state took over, appraisal is based on the actual RE value of the property, regardless of use. Farmers took a big hit and so did folks with unimproved lots and well as seasonal residents. That is why there was substantial sale of properties in the late 80's and 90's. Many folks could not afford their properties after seeing their property taxes quadrupled and more! Hence the 'view' tax debate by NH farmers in the days. One farmer in Gilford saw a six fold increase in his property tax only because the location of his property has substantial view of the Belknaps, Ossipee and White Mountains.

So Commercial properties and full-time residence who are also the tax payers are happy campers. They saw a big reduction in their property tax.

This is one reason why the current property tax structure is unreasonable. There is growing sentiment of a broad based tax such as the value added tax.

I don't know about Moultonboro, the town is unique as it has more lakefront properties than any other town. Back in the days, Moultonboro had substantial unimproved properties. Now there are very little,
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 09:43 AM   #13
wifi
Senior Member
 
wifi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lakes Region
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 282
Thanked 287 Times in 169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadHopper View Post
Looks like you were not around back in the 80's when the state took over property evaluation to help equalize education payments among towns. This concept is still a mess today and the legislature is still scrambling after the NH Supreme Court shut down the current distribution structure.

Before this whole mess, the towns would appraise properties according to present use, residential, agricultural, commercial, unimproved etc. It made sense to tax the year round residence because they use the schools etc. And the seasonal will get a break.

When the state took over, appraisal is based on the actual RE value of the property, regardless of use. Farmers took a big hit and so did folks with unimproved lots and well as seasonal residents. That is why there was substantial sale of properties in the late 80's and 90's. Many folks could not afford their properties after seeing their property taxes quadrupled and more! Hence the 'view' tax debate by NH farmers in the days. One farmer in Gilford saw a six fold increase in his property tax only because the location of his property has substantial view of the Belknaps, Ossipee and White Mountains.

So Commercial properties and full-time residence who are also the tax payers are happy campers. They saw a big reduction in their property tax.

This is one reason why the current property tax structure is unreasonable. There is growing sentiment of a broad based tax such as the value added tax.

I don't know about Moultonboro, the town is unique as it has more lakefront properties than any other town. Back in the days, Moultonboro had substantial unimproved properties. Now there are very little,
Actually, I was around in the 80's, having both a summer house and a residence. There was nothing, on my bill, that taxed one place more than the other. No one bill raised or lowered more than the other one.

I remember well the view tax debate, but it wasn't residence vs non resident owners, EVERYBODY got hit. There was an article of a selectman in a town being hit by a large "view tax", but he was blind... a big uproar.

Broad based taxes based on the old notion of a view tax or on the thought that taxes are unfair.... taxes will ALWAYS be unfair to someone, no matter how you slice the cake. We don't need the government taking a larger slice, which will happen with any tax law change.

Sorry, this probably needs its own thread, apologies to the OP.
wifi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2014, 09:50 AM   #14
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,410
Thanks: 719
Thanked 1,381 Times in 957 Posts
Default

I disagree too, Broadhopper. I don't know where you got the idea that year round people were taxed differently than seasonal. I never heard of that. When the state took over the school tax, the towns on the lake-the so called rich towns -got hit a lot harder because they had to pay more than the poor towns.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tis For This Useful Post:
chasedawg (08-21-2014)
Old 08-26-2014, 11:17 AM   #15
Little Bear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 561
Thanks: 105
Thanked 237 Times in 126 Posts
Default

It seems that the assessments on land values on the islands have jumped significantly. I don't know where they get the justification for this. I've had discussions with several Tuftonboro island residents about this, and everyone is a bit irate. The town will have some explaining to do....

FYI: I use Attorney Phil Broulliard out of Laconia for my abatements. He does all the work and his fee is 1/2 of the first year of any tax savings that the abatement brings. It's really a no-brainer. No savings, no fee.
Little Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

This page was generated in 0.25759 seconds