Because NH wants to keep land unposted, it has to be exclusive.
Which would only give the one person the ''right'' to continue to do so.
The access to the land and amount to be entered into conversation will depend on the planning boards and owner's agreement.
But the continuing prominence of people to keep suggesting that possession is a good reason to post property rather than wait to see if the courts would go the other way.
It would also mean the title was not clear... so the title companies in NH would need to take a lot more caution.
|