I don't think so.
#1 was placed into law by what was considered the most conservative Republicans in our State history.
I seriously doubt that the State would take on an expense that it didn't have to.
And the ''procedure'' is for application. The RSA is very specific on transfer of expenses to another municipality.
So you mean ''Loitering''?
Its the camping... and since it is State land... a little different.
We not only tolerate it... we promote it.
The causes of homelessness are promoted by the City.
|