View Single Post
Old 09-11-2007, 08:04 AM   #100
codeman671
Senior Member
 
codeman671's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,345
Thanks: 206
Thanked 759 Times in 443 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pineedles
For those of us that CAN'T vote, you who can should voice your concern as to enforcing all existing laws regarding laws that may have been broken as well as reponsible parties laws. As well as compensation that the State, County, and Town are forthcoming to them, due to the costs that have been incurred. (MP patrols around dive site). Apologies to the registered owners of this vessel, but we must have complete responsibility taken care of before we, the unheard from are asked to PAY MORE in taxes. Who is going to pay for this search? Sorry, No smilie faces.
What laws may have been broken here??? What are you talking about? A boat sank for reasons unknown and luckily the the occupants were safe. Had this happened a bit later in the season when water temps are lower this could have been tragic.

Being a waterfront owner I am happy to hear much effort (and a lot of volunteer hours as well) is being put into locating and raising the boat. Leaving hazardous materials at the bottom of the lake does not thrill me.

Usually as part of your marine insurance policy they would cover the search and raising of the vessel up to a certain point. Even if they had hit something which does not sound to be the issue the collision coverage would cover that.
codeman671 is offline   Reply With Quote