View Single Post
Old 09-17-2014, 09:17 PM   #78
Rusty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 603
Thanked 687 Times in 425 Posts
Default

We know that he told the MP about “private” markers not being approved because the MP said this: "so you are correct that "private" markers are not approved on navigable waters across the state."

Also we know he said something to make the MP say this: “While the intention is good, to your point, if everyone took it upon themselves to "courtesy mark" what they perceived as a navigational hazard may cause greater confusion to those trying to navigate an already precarious
body of water.

So what is the MP supposed to do?…well……exactly what the person who asked the questions wanted him to do.
__________________
It's never crowded along the extra mile.
Rusty is offline   Reply With Quote