Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD
Shed, I don't understand how you can be so steadfastly sure of your views as settled science when the foundation and core of AGW is crumbling around you. From the admission that the IPCC assertion, that the Himalayan glaciers would be gone by 2035, is wrong. Turns out it was based on a fluff piece by an environmental advocacy group and is patently untrue. To the admission by Phil Jones that the climate may have been warmer in medieval times and that there has been no "statistically significant" warming in the past 15 years. There is no such thing as "settled science". Any one who uses that term is just trying to take your money.
|
ITD, that's why I believe that the term"Global Climate Change" came about as no matter what happens around the world weather wise it can be contributed to "Global Climate Change" to support their arguement. Vague and loose terminology.
