The setback doesn't just suggest continuing circling... but a simple pass.
As more lake traffic develops, it isn't a single vessel creating the wakes or the resulting erosion.
The basic scope is that an abutting property owners usage is finite if it damages a neighbors' property.
The runoff - septic or otherwise - into the lake is considered the abutting lakefront owners doing damage to a public property, and thus gets restrictions.
But the public property owners can also do damage to their abutting lakefront neighbors - some restriction are going to occur there.
Personally, I just think creating what would be now three categories - if I am counting correctly - is just adding complexity to the issue.
|