View Single Post
Old 10-15-2023, 10:56 PM   #43
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 2
Thanked 529 Times in 435 Posts
Default

You can check the other tributaries around Winnipesaukee...
They may have come downstream.

But that would not change the outcomes.

A large reduction in game fish would impede license sales. No expenditure by the state.

It would put into question an expenditure to upgrade the fish hatchery or simply abandon it. The upgrade is required for ongoing operations per court order. Abandoning it would lower state expenditure.

Laconia may, only may, have to backwash more often for its osmosis filter... or any first line filtering system. That would also be homeowners drawing directly from the lake. Again, no expenditure by the state.

The only expenditure born by the state would be monitoring; which is already ongoing.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote