You make a lot of valid points, as usual.
However, it would be nice if the value and tax situation were as it should be...
The valuation increased...
The tax billed increased...
and $81,000 is a drop in the bucket to Gilford's spenditis condition.
A lot of Reps bought the fear version for a speed limit to make the Lake safer.
Question: Why is Concord not pushing to better fund MP if so many there believe the Lake is unsafe?
Funding should reflect their feelings - or does it? Perhaps their votes were for job security and not reflective of their true feelings.
Then, again, what business person would spend thousands for a return of much less? Guess they have a money tree in their yard and think MP has one also.
P.S.- Your response was of its usual quality. I'm just exacerbated with Concord's methodology.
Interesting links:
http://www.sos.nh.gov/2006%20Receipt...ates/index.htm
http://www.sos.nh.gov/2006%20Receipt...pacs/index.htm
http://www.sos.nh.gov/political%20page.htm