View Single Post
Old 10-21-2006, 10:31 PM   #16
GWC...
Senior Member
 
GWC...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You make a lot of valid points, as usual.

However, it would be nice if the value and tax situation were as it should be...

The valuation increased...

The tax billed increased...

and $81,000 is a drop in the bucket to Gilford's spenditis condition.

A lot of Reps bought the fear version for a speed limit to make the Lake safer.

Question: Why is Concord not pushing to better fund MP if so many there believe the Lake is unsafe?

Funding should reflect their feelings - or does it? Perhaps their votes were for job security and not reflective of their true feelings.

Then, again, what business person would spend thousands for a return of much less? Guess they have a money tree in their yard and think MP has one also.

P.S.- Your response was of its usual quality. I'm just exacerbated with Concord's methodology.

Interesting links:
http://www.sos.nh.gov/2006%20Receipt...ates/index.htm

http://www.sos.nh.gov/2006%20Receipt...pacs/index.htm

http://www.sos.nh.gov/political%20page.htm
__________________
[Assume funny, clever sig is here. Laugh and reflect... ]
GWC... is offline   Reply With Quote