View Single Post
Old 02-03-2024, 08:02 PM   #22
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,417
Thanks: 720
Thanked 1,386 Times in 960 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Maybe a couple reasons... PWC long ago went to 300 feet. So for larger craft with more displacement, they probably expect at least that.

Inconsequential could also mean that due to the size of Winnipesuakee, it left plenty of area to operate without even coming close to shore. Even the 500 foot proposal shows plenty of open area.

I'm not sure that's the exact word he used, but you make a good point.
tis is offline   Reply With Quote