I’m tired of being called a liar by the speed limits crowd a group that refuses to back up their barnyard expletive!
Here is the posting from BI’s thread in which I clearly spelled out my criteria for “speed” .....low and behold there is also the number 47 speed related accidents the speed limit crowd says occurred on Winnipesaukee in 2006.
I've bolded my comment on the criteria for speed so that the speed limit crowd doesn't have to look too hard!
http://www.winnipesaukee.com/forums/...ead.php?t=6070
In post #5 of that thread you will find a link to the 2006 stats provided by Woodsy.
Anyone feel safe yet?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by Islander:
I think you left out a few qualifications. That data is only for one year on one lake. Even then I just counted 47 accidents in 2006 on Winnipesaukee involving speed.
You really need to post all those qualifications.
|
I used data from the same year that Bear Islander's article used that claimed to show a major jump in boating accidents in New Hampshire. I gave you the link that I used and I broke down everything that I saw.
The data I presented was for the entire state of New Hampshire not just Lake Winnipesaukee, so you didn't bother to read it, heh?
You claim 47 accidents on Lake Winnipesaukee in 2006 involving speed? Please document your claim and define "speed".
For these discussions I define "speed" as the proposed limits to YOUR law, 45/25.
I only show 2 accidents on Lake Winnipesaukee and 4 in the entire state that come close to that definition using New Hampshire statistics, none involving another vessel or a GFBL boat.
On Lake Winnipesaukee one PWC at 50 MPH and the other PWC at "Excessive Speed"..."Excessive Speed"...the definition that many supporters of HB847 claims does not exist...and it involved a turn so it was probably less than 45 mph.
Your move.
|