View Single Post
Old 02-07-2008, 10:53 AM   #42
hazelnut
Senior Member
 
hazelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,348
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 508
Thanked 462 Times in 162 Posts
Default Pathetic

Seriously way too many individuals on this forum must be X-Files fans or major conspiracy theorists. Many of you have lost any and all credibility on this forum over the last 24 hours.

Tim Dunleavy does an EXCELLENT job DENYING allegations of fudging the data.

Let's begin with the HEADLINE!!!!!!!
Tim Dunleavy: Marine Patrol's data on Winnipesaukee boat speeds are untainted

Here it is again:
Tim Dunleavy: Marine Patrol's data on Winnipesaukee boat speeds are untainted

Let's try ...... BLUE:
Tim Dunleavy: Marine Patrol's data on Winnipesaukee boat speeds are untainted

Ok not clear enough how about....... ORANGE oooooooooohhhhhh:

Tim Dunleavy: Marine Patrol's data on Winnipesaukee boat speeds are untainted
oooohhhh prettyyyyyy.

Now I am no Rocket Scientist but if the headline states, one more time:
Tim Dunleavy: Marine Patrol's data on Winnipesaukee boat speeds are untainted
I can only deduce, scientifically mind you, that the "DATA" produced by "MARINE PARTROL" is "UNTAINTED." Wait I know, I know, the conspiracy theorists will say... Well, we don't know if that is a direct quote or if the Union Leader paraphrased. Well, well, well, you FOUND IT, the loophole. Yes the editor read the letter and paraphrased the theme/message/intent. The editor deduced, scientifically mind you, that the letter makes the case/claim/argument that... ONE LAST TIME EVERYBODY TOGETHER NOW:

Tim Dunleavy: Marine Patrol's data on Winnipesaukee boat speeds are untainted

Wow green is pretty too.
hazelnut is offline