Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real BigGuy
It always seems unfair to me that a state can say, “we believe, but aren’t really sure, that a property has significant historical artifacts on it but, we are not going to do anything to investigate/retrieve these artifacts. However, Mr/Mrs Buyer you will be responsible for the costs of investigating and properly retrieving them and then they will belong to the state not to you.” Sounds totally unfair to me. If I’m paying for the work, shouldn’t I own the proceeds?
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app |
Right, the state can buy the land and put up an indian museum if it's so important. Otherwise, but out.